Kesiah Olvera
Janel Spencer
WRT 101S
3 October 2019
Rhetorical Analysis: Make College Free For All
Vermont senator and presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, writes an article posted on The Washington Post, which argues why college should be free. In his article, “Make College Free For All” (October 22, 2015), Sanders argues that higher education should be free for all American students. By doing so, this allows the youth to reach their full potential in education, which then causes a stronger economy as well as a stronger democracy in the future which our young adults hold. In the article, Bernie Sanders’s purpose is to convince his targeted audience, populists, that college needs to be free and we must give everyone a chance. Sanders provides numerous ways of persuasion. Such as the use of personal experiences, multiple scenarios from American history which includes our 19th president, Rutherford B. Hayes, and adds on by using other countries that do have free college as great examples.
Bernie sanders uses his background experiences and early life as ethos. Born in 1941, politician Sanders started his political career as the mayor of Burlington, Vermont. Currently Vermont senator and democratic candidate for president. He was born and raised in Brooklyn with an under privileged upbringing which gives him a unique perspective. Sanders is able to identify with both lower and higher classes which shows the audience his understanding of both classes.
Sanders, starts off his article by stating “Hayes, a Republican, didn’t worry that some poor kid might benefit from access to ‘free stuff’ nor did he believe that the children of wealthy elites should be excluded from the universal nature of the program. For him, education was the basis for full economic and political participation, and full participation was the basis for all prosperity. An education should be available to all regardless of anyone’s station”(Sanders). He uses both ethos and pathos to persuade his audience. He includes ethos by including a quote from the United States 19th president, Rutherford B. Hayes. The reader knows that Hayes is more than a trusted source, considering, he has contributed incredibly to America alone. Bernie Sanders adds pathos by describing underprivileged students as “some poor kid” in contrast with “children of wealthy elites” (Sanders), which he describes the students who are more well-off. He then continues by mentioning topics that may be further appealing to his audience which includes economy and political status. He claims that Hayes believes education is essential for full economic as well as political participation.
Bernie Sanders adds to his argument by mentioning other successful countries who provide free college to their people. I’m not sure how effective this may be, considering populist’s want to believe our country is the most successful and in turn don’t want to look at other countries for inspiration. Although, this may be true, Sanders still reminds his audience that our country can and should always be looking for ways to improve. Bernie states, “In Finland, Denmark, Ireland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and Mexico, public colleges and universities remain tuition-free. They’re free throughout Germany, too, and not just for Germans or Europeans but for international citizens as well. That’s why every year, more than 4,600 students leave the
United States and enroll in German universities” (Sanders). When his audience is informed and reminded
of almost 5,000 students leaving the United States yearly to get an affordable education, it gives them a wake up call or a realization. Populists want to keep their people here; the more they lose, the less that is contributed to its economy. Sanders then builds on his argument and calls attention to the differences between our government and the others. He adds pathos to the following by inferring that the United States doesn’t value the importance of the youth by stating “Governments in these countries understand what an important investment they are making, not just in the individuals who are able to acquire knowledge and skills but for the societies these students will serve as teachers, architects, scientists, entrepreneurs and more” (Sanders).
Bernie Sanders uses his personal experiences, America’s history, and a comparison of the U.S. to other countries to make his argument persuasive. He successfully targeted his audience by acknowledging their values. Doing so, then caught their attention and interest as to why this topic should be relevant to them. Sanders focused on the benefits free college has on the U.S. and its economy rather than the benefits for families and young adults because he knew his audience would much rather hear about how the U.S. and its money affected. He ends off his article by stating, “We will have a stronger economy and a stronger democracy when all young people with the ambition and the talent can reach their full potential, regardless of their circumstances at birth” (Sanders). By this, he adds a sense of urgency and call to action letting his audience know that as soon as we provide free college for our students, no matter their circumstance, we will be more successful as a country; a win win for all. I believe Bernie used rhetorical strategies appropriately and succeeded at convincing his audience that college should be free.
Works Cited
Sanders, Bernie. “Make College Free For All.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 22 Oct. i 2015, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/bernie-sanders-america-needs-free-college-now/2015/10/22/a3d05512-7685-11e5-bc80-9091021aeb69_story.html?noredirect=on.